Sources and method
What follows is the method behind the table. Every place in it comes out of a calculation over facts we can cite, using the criteria and weights below. We use the same weights on all our sites, which is what stops a platform from being nudged upward on one of them.
Criteria and weights
| Criterion | Weight | Better when |
|---|---|---|
| Anonymity (no KYC) | 3.0 | lower is better |
| Withdrawal speed | 2.5 | lower is better |
| Cryptocurrencies accepted | 2.0 | higher is better |
| Licence | 2.0 | higher is better |
| Sports covered | 1.5 | higher is better |
| Minimum deposit | 1.0 | lower is better |
| Welcome bonus | 0.5 | higher is better |
Related on this site: USDT bonus wagering terms and Wallets that hold USDT.
How a score is calculated
For each criterion, platforms are compared against each other rather than against an invented ideal: the best value in the column scores 1, the worst scores 0, the rest fall in between. Those values are multiplied by the weights above and divided by the total weight of the criteria we actually know for that platform. The result is shown as a score out of five.
When we do not know
Fewer than 3 known criteria means no position: the platform is listed apart, under insufficient data. The rule exists because without it, a platform we have simply failed to research would settle at the bottom of the table and read as the worst one there.
An unknown value appears as a dash, never as an estimate, and that criterion is dropped from the platform's score rather than scored as a zero.
Where each value comes from
Behind every figure in the table is a named source and the date we last looked. Anything taken from an independent review rather than the platform's own pages is flagged that way in our records and re-checked before publication.
Links on this site earn us a commission when someone opens an account. It buys no position: the weights are fixed above, and the same calculation runs whoever is paying.