Dexsport reviewed against our criteria

Dexsport is a Web3-native trading venue where entry is anonymous via Web3 wallets and no KYC is required, according to the project's JAN proposal v1.2 (Karma Korp, checked 2026-09-14). The platform supports 85+ coins across 20+ blockchains, and operates under a licence held by Dexapp LTD in Anjouan. Those three data points are the entire verified fact base for this page; everything below explains what they mean for someone deciding where to place capital, and nothing more.

What the licence actually covers

The licence is registered to Dexapp LTD, an entity incorporated in Anjouan. That is the corporate counterparty a user is dealing with when they open a position on Dexsport. The JAN proposal does not state which specific activities the Anjouan licence authorises, nor does it list the supervisory regime, capital requirements, or complaint procedures attached to it. Treat the licence as a fact about the operating entity's registration, not as a statement about the scope of regulatory protection available to a user in the Netherlands.

For a Dutch reader, the relevant gap is this: an Anjouan-registered entity does not hold a licence from the Kansspelautoriteit (KSA), the Dutch gambling regulator. If your decision depends on using a platform licensed in the Netherlands, this fact alone does not satisfy that requirement, and the fact base contains nothing that would.

Wallet-only entry and what it removes from the process

Entry is via Web3 wallets, with no KYC step. In operational terms, that removes identity verification from the onboarding path: no document upload, no proof-of-address check, no waiting period tied to a compliance review. What it does not remove is the wallet itself — a user still needs a self-custody wallet and control of its keys, because that wallet is the account.

The trade-off is symmetrical. A wallet-based account has no intermediary that can freeze, reverse, or recover a transaction on the user's behalf. There is no chargeback path and no support desk that can restore access if seed phrases are lost. The absence of KYC and the absence of recourse come from the same design choice; they are not two separate features.

85+ coins across 20+ blockchains

The proposal states 85+ coins and 20+ blockchains. Those are the only two coverage numbers available, and they are stated as minimums, not exact counts — "85+" and "20+" mean at least that many, not precisely that many.

Two things follow for anyone comparing venues. First, breadth of listings is not the same as depth: the fact base says nothing about order book depth, spreads, or which pairs carry the most volume, so a long coin list cannot be read as a liquidity claim. Second, multi-chain support means the deposit and withdrawal rail depends on which chain you use — gas costs, confirmation times, and bridge risk sit with the chain, not with the venue. The fact base does not name which chains are included, so any specific chain assumption is unverified.

Where the numbers stop

Every figure on this page is a count or a yes/no from a single document. There are no fee schedules, no leverage limits, no minimum deposit, no withdrawal thresholds, and no published spreads in the fact base. That matters for a decision about money, because cost is usually the deciding variable and cost is exactly what is missing here.

The practical consequence: any comparison between Dexsport and another venue has to be built on figures the reader collects directly — fees quoted at the point of trade, funding rates if applicable, and the actual spread on the pair being traded. The calculator on this page handles the arithmetic once those inputs exist; this text deliberately does not substitute invented examples for them, because a number that is not in the source document cannot be checked and will not stay true.

What to verify before committing capital

Three checks follow directly from what is and is not in the fact base. Confirm the current licence status and the exact entity name with the Anjouan registry, since the proposal is a project document dated 2026-09-14 and registrations change. Confirm the specific chains and coins you intend to use, because "20+ blockchains" does not guarantee the one you need. Confirm the fee and withdrawal terms on the platform itself at the moment of use, since none are recorded here.

Until those are confirmed, the verified position is narrow: anonymous wallet entry, no KYC, 85+ coins, 20+ chains, Anjouan-licensed operator. That is enough to decide whether the structure fits your requirements. It is not enough to decide whether the economics do.

Before you ask

Does Dexsport hold a licence from the Dutch gambling regulator?

No. Dexsport operates under a licence held by Dexapp LTD in Anjouan, not under a licence from the Kansspelautoriteit (KSA). An Anjouan-registered entity does not satisfy the requirement of using a platform licensed in the Netherlands.

Is there a KYC check when opening a position on Dexsport?

No. Entry is anonymous via Web3 wallets and no KYC is required, so there is no document upload, proof-of-address check, or compliance waiting period.

If I use Dexsport from the Netherlands, can I rely on Cruks to block my access?

No. Cruks blocks access to licensed Dutch operators, and Dexsport is not licensed by the Kansspelautoriteit. The fact base contains nothing indicating that Cruks applies to this Anjouan-licensed platform.

What recourse do I have if a transaction goes wrong on Dexsport?

None through the platform itself. A wallet-based account has no intermediary that can freeze, reverse, or recover a transaction, and there is no chargeback path or support desk that can restore access if seed phrases are lost.

Which specific blockchains and coins are supported on Dexsport?

The proposal states 85+ coins across 20+ blockchains as minimums, but it does not name which chains or coins are included. Any assumption about a specific chain or coin is unverified.